Blog

  • Fragomen appointed as European regional representative for Swiss based citizenship-by-investment association

    London, December 2015

    Fragomen LLP has been appointed as the Investment Migration Council (IMC) Regional Representative Office (RRO) for Europe.

    Last November, Fragomen Worldwide, the world’s leading immigration services provider, joined with other leaders in the fields of immigration and citizenship-by-investment to establish the Investment Migration Council (IMC). IMC Advisory Committee members include Austin Fragomen, partner and chairman of the Fragomen Worldwide Executive Committee and Nadine Goldfoot, partner.

    The Geneva-based nonprofit organisation was created to improve public understanding of the issues faced by investors and governments, promote education of the field, and propagate professional standards and ethics. The IMC is initially opening offices in New York, London and Hong Kong. Professor Dr. Dimitry Kochenov, chair in European Union Constitutional and Citizenship Law at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, is serving as IMC chairman.

    “Investor immigration is a diverse, rapidly growing field being driven by a variety of factors, including growing private wealth in emerging economies, interest in visa-free travel, and high-net-worth individuals seeking insurance against political, social or economic upheaval at home,” said Nadine Goldfoot. “The IMC will serve as the primary organisation for the field, bringing together key stakeholders and giving the industry an official voice. As the Europe RRO we will we working closely with our colleagues in the industry to promote best practice and share thought leadership throughout the region.

    As a world leader in immigration, Fragomen has extensive knowledge of investor migration policies and programs around the world. The firm’s Worldwide Private Client Practice provides assistance to high-net-worth individuals, their families and their advisors as they navigate the complexities of alternative citizenship and residency programs in jurisdictions worldwide.

     

    About Fragomen Worldwide

    The Fragomen Worldwide organisation is recognised as the world’s leading global immigration services provider. The firm employs more than 500 attorneys, solicitors or similar immigration professionals, and over 1,500 additional immigration professionals and staff located in more than 40 offices in 20 countries. Each Fragomen office is established either as a law firm or an immigration consultancy, in accordance with applicable local law and regulation. For more than 60 years, Fragomen has represented a broad range of companies, organisations and emerging businesses, working in partnership with clients to facilitate the transfer of employees worldwide. For detailed information about Fragomen’s practice, please visit www.fragomen.com.

     

     

     

  • Opening of IMC office in Hong Kong

    The Investment Migration Council (IMC), the worldwide association for Investor Immigration and Citizenship-by-Investment, head quartered in Geneva, has recently opened an office in Hong Kong represented by Mandeville & Associates.

    This ‘touch point’ serves to spread the reach of the IMC and its work throughout some of the key markets in the world. Mandeville & Associates has its own committees, and contribute to elevating standards regionally. It is also expected that the office will organize a number of briefings, provide business opportunities and act as information stations for governments, the public and media.

    Bruno L’ecuyer, IMC CEO, commented that ‘the opening of this representative office is only the beginning as from here the council will expand to London and New York by the end of 2015, offering a coherent global framework of ethical and professional conduct to this relatively new industry.’

    L’ecuyer further mentioned that ‘this office adds further value and helps immensely on improving public understanding and transparency of investor immigration and citizenship programs.’

    Mandeville & Associates, with over 20 years of solid experience in the industry, will further support global finances and will act as IMC representative in its respected business hub.

     

    About the IMC

    The Investment Migration Council (IMC) is the worldwide association for investor immigration and citizenship-by-investment, bringing together the leading stakeholders in the field and giving the industry a voice. The IMC is a Swiss registered non-profit association with its headquarters in Geneva.

     

    About Mandeville & Associates

    Established in 1996, Mandeville & Associates Ltd. offers counselling services intended for international business people of every continent desiring to settle in the United States of America, Canada and Europe.

    With our head office in Hong Kong and professionals permanently based in Beijing, Singapore and Shanghai, our firm offers a wide range of immigration and consultancy services with a team of specialized lawyers and multilingual supporting staff at our four locations.

  • Opening of IMC offices in Dubai and Hong Kong

    The Investment Migration Council (IMC), the worldwide association for Investor Immigration and Citizenship-by-Investment, head quartered in Geneva, has recently opened an office in Dubai, represented by Citizenship Invest and also in Hong Kong, represented by Mandeville & Associates.

    These ‘touch points’ serve to spread the reach of the IMC and its work throughout some of the key markets in the world. They have their own committees, and contribute to elevating standards regionally. It is also expected that the offices will organize a number of briefings, provide business opportunities and act as information stations for governments, the public and media.

    Bruno L’ecuyer, IMC CEO, commented that ‘the opening of these representative offices is only the beginning as from here the council will expand to London and New York by the end of 2015, offering a coherent global framework of ethical and professional conduct to this relatively new industry.’

    L’ecuyer further mentioned that ‘both of these offices add further value and help immensely on improving public understanding and transparency of investor immigration and citizenship programs.’

    Citizenship Invest is classified as one of the leading companies licenced by various governments to process citizenship with a longer-standing track record within the industry and Mandeville & Associates, with over 20 years of solid experience in the industry will further support global finances. Both will act as representatives in their respected business hub.

     

    About the IMC

    The Investment Migration Council (IMC) is the worldwide association for investor immigration and citizenship-by-investment, bringing together the leading stakeholders in the field and giving the industry a voice. The IMC is a Swiss registered non-profit association with its headquarters in Geneva.

     

    About Citizenship Invest

    Citizenship Invest (CI) is recognized as a leading specialist in Citizenship by Investment programs. CI has processed citizenship applications for families in more than 40 countries across Middle East, Asia, Africa and Europe. The company started 6 years ago and is now one of the few selected which are licensed by various Governments to process their citizenship and this year has been carefully selected to represent the IMC in Middle East.

     

    About Mandeville & Associates

    Established in 1996, Mandeville & Associates Ltd. offers counselling services intended for international business people of every continent desiring to settle in the United States of America, Canada and Europe.

    With our head office in Hong Kong and professionals permanently based in Beijing, Singapore and Shanghai, our firm offers a wide range of immigration and consultancy services with a team of specialized lawyers and multilingual supporting staff at our four locations.

  • Nine things to worry about when your company decides to relocate you to the United States

    In the last 10 days, I have met with no less than four people whose companies are relocating them to the United States. These people are being asked to relocate for periods of up to three years, with the possibility that the assignment could be extended further. There are a number of issues that arise when an individual relocates to, and potentially becomes a tax resident of, the United States. Below are nine issues that should be addressed in such a situation. Each issue is discussed in brief, and a U.S. tax advisor should be consulted if any of these situations apply.

    1. Make sure your bank will still work with you.

    Many banks now have policies, for non-tax reasons, that they will not work with people resident in the United States. Before you move to the United States, make sure that your bank will continue to work with you while you are in the United States. If not, consider moving the bank account to an institution that will work with you while in the United States, or alternatively, consider having an external asset manager, who is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a registered investment advisor, be your contact person. Otherwise, the financial institution will close the account.

    1. Does your portfolio hold investment funds?

    The United States has very strict rules as to the taxation of offshore investment funds, such as Luxembourg SICAVs. These can be subject to disastrous tax consequences if held by a U.S. tax resident. Prior to moving to the United States, individuals should review their portfolio to determine whether or not they have offshore investment funds. While it would be simplest for such individuals not to hold offshore investment funds while resident in the United States, if they do, they should consult with their U.S. tax advisor and investment manager to evaluate whether or not such investments should be held while in the United States. In many cases, there are possibilities to address holding such investments, and these should be discussed with the relevant advisors.

    1. Do you have an interest in a trust?

    The United States has adverse U.S. tax rules for U.S. tax residents who settle or benefit from certain non-U.S. trusts. These rules can apply to trusts settled by an executive before the executive relocates to the United States. Further, these rules can apply to distributions the executive receives from a trust settled by other persons. Individuals relocating to the United States should review existing trust arrangements prior to moving to the United States. In addition, they should review any plans of family members to establish trusts from which the individual might benefit. Individuals relocating to the United States should consult with their U.S. tax advisors to discuss planning to mitigate the adverse rules applicable for U.S. tax residents with interests in non-U.S. trusts.

    1. Stepping up basis in assets.

    Unlike many countries, the United States does not give an individual a new acquisition value in his or her currently held assets when he or she moves to the United States. Instead, the assets retain their original acquisition value. This can lead to high capital gains taxes if the assets are sold while resident in the United States. Thus, it becomes imperative that prior to a move to the United States one steps up the basis in his or her assets to the current fair market value. Oftentimes this can be as simple as completing a sale and a repurchase at fair market value of the assets within an appropriate timeframe, ensuring that there is adequate distance between the two. Thus if the assets are subsequently sold, the price at the repurchase will be used as the cost basis for U.S. tax purposes, reducing the potential capital gains tax.

    1. No holding companies.

    It is quite common for people around the world to hold their assets through a holding company. Oftentimes these have significant tax benefits, depending on the tax jurisdiction at issue. In some jurisdictions, however, such structures do not provide a tax benefit and, moreover, can actually be extremely tax disadvantageous. In the United States, there is a set of rules called the Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules that can cause income to be taxed at significantly higher rates than it would otherwise be if the income is earned by a non-U.S. company owned by a U.S. resident. While a detailed description of the CFC rules is beyond the scope of this article, a U.S. tax advisor should be consulted if any non-U.S. holding companies are owned.

    1. Evaluate the issue of assets held through community of heirs.

    Many people in Switzerland hold assets that they inherited through what is known as “community of heirs.” There are many misconceptions regarding the tax treatment of the community of heirs. Some people take the view that these are taxed as estates. Other times people take the view that they are taxed as simple partnerships. The law in this area is very unclear and can lead to undesirable results if no additional planning is done.

    1. The importance of timing.

    In comedy and tax planning, timing is everything. For an executive relocating to the United States, timing is critical. The timing of an individual’s U.S. residency start date impacts when the individual first becomes subject to U.S. tax as a resident. Timing the recognition of income and losses (and coordinating that timing with the residency start date) can yield significant tax savings. Many executives can control some aspects of when they recognize income or losses; for example, by having dividends paid from controlled companies, accelerating collections, or recognition of bonuses and services income. Due to the importance of timing, individuals are well advised to consult with their U.S. tax advisors early when considering a relocation.

    1. Planning for a potential long term move to the United States.

    While people are always excited about a short term relocation to the United States, it is common for some people to end up staying in the United States indefinitely. While income tax for U.S. purposes is an important concern, the U.S. estate tax, which can be as high as 40 percent of the taxable estate, can be extremely devastating. Planning can be done in advance of a move to the United States to help mitigate the impact of the estate tax, if there is even a remote chance that the individual might stay in the United States long term.

    1. Do not keep money undeclared.

    Even if one is going to the United States for only a short period of time, one should under no circumstances fail to report income or assets to the United States. The United States taxes its residents on a worldwide basis, unlike most other nations, and income earned outside of the United States must be reported and subject to tax. Foreign income and assets are also subject to special reporting requirements under U.S. law and the United States is extremely aggressive in this area. A U.S. tax advisor should be consulted on the tax and reporting obligations that might apply to an individual relocating to the United States, who will likely have significant income and assets in his or her home country.

    Author: Marnin Michaels, Partner, Baker & McKenzie Zurich, Switzerland

    www.bakermckenzie.com

  • Nine things to worry about when your company decides to relocate you to the United States

    In the last 10 days, I have met with no less than four people whose companies are relocating them to the United States. These people are being asked to relocate for periods of up to three years, with the possibility that the assignment could be extended further. There are a number of issues that arise when an individual relocates to, and potentially becomes a tax resident of, the United States. Below are nine issues that should be addressed in such a situation. Each issue is discussed in brief, and a U.S. tax advisor should be consulted if any of these situations apply.

    1. Make sure your bank will still work with you.

    Many banks now have policies, for non-tax reasons, that they will not work with people resident in the United States. Before you move to the United States, make sure that your bank will continue to work with you while you are in the United States. If not, consider moving the bank account to an institution that will work with you while in the United States, or alternatively, consider having an external asset manager, who is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a registered investment advisor, be your contact person. Otherwise, the financial institution will close the account.

    1. Does your portfolio hold investment funds?

    The United States has very strict rules as to the taxation of offshore investment funds, such as Luxembourg SICAVs. These can be subject to disastrous tax consequences if held by a U.S. tax resident. Prior to moving to the United States, individuals should review their portfolio to determine whether or not they have offshore investment funds. While it would be simplest for such individuals not to hold offshore investment funds while resident in the United States, if they do, they should consult with their U.S. tax advisor and investment manager to evaluate whether or not such investments should be held while in the United States. In many cases, there are possibilities to address holding such investments, and these should be discussed with the relevant advisors.

    1. Do you have an interest in a trust?

    The United States has adverse U.S. tax rules for U.S. tax residents who settle or benefit from certain non-U.S. trusts. These rules can apply to trusts settled by an executive before the executive relocates to the United States. Further, these rules can apply to distributions the executive receives from a trust settled by other persons. Individuals relocating to the United States should review existing trust arrangements prior to moving to the United States. In addition, they should review any plans of family members to establish trusts from which the individual might benefit. Individuals relocating to the United States should consult with their U.S. tax advisors to discuss planning to mitigate the adverse rules applicable for U.S. tax residents with interests in non-U.S. trusts.

    1. Stepping up basis in assets.

    Unlike many countries, the United States does not give an individual a new acquisition value in his or her currently held assets when he or she moves to the United States. Instead, the assets retain their original acquisition value. This can lead to high capital gains taxes if the assets are sold while resident in the United States. Thus, it becomes imperative that prior to a move to the United States one steps up the basis in his or her assets to the current fair market value. Oftentimes this can be as simple as completing a sale and a repurchase at fair market value of the assets within an appropriate timeframe, ensuring that there is adequate distance between the two. Thus if the assets are subsequently sold, the price at the repurchase will be used as the cost basis for U.S. tax purposes, reducing the potential capital gains tax.

    1. No holding companies.

    It is quite common for people around the world to hold their assets through a holding company. Oftentimes these have significant tax benefits, depending on the tax jurisdiction at issue. In some jurisdictions, however, such structures do not provide a tax benefit and, moreover, can actually be extremely tax disadvantageous. In the United States, there is a set of rules called the Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules that can cause income to be taxed at significantly higher rates than it would otherwise be if the income is earned by a non-U.S. company owned by a U.S. resident. While a detailed description of the CFC rules is beyond the scope of this article, a U.S. tax advisor should be consulted if any non-U.S. holding companies are owned.

    1. Evaluate the issue of assets held through community of heirs.

    Many people in Switzerland hold assets that they inherited through what is known as “community of heirs.” There are many misconceptions regarding the tax treatment of the community of heirs. Some people take the view that these are taxed as estates. Other times people take the view that they are taxed as simple partnerships. The law in this area is very unclear and can lead to undesirable results if no additional planning is done.

    1. The importance of timing.

    In comedy and tax planning, timing is everything. For an executive relocating to the United States, timing is critical. The timing of an individual’s U.S. residency start date impacts when the individual first becomes subject to U.S. tax as a resident. Timing the recognition of income and losses (and coordinating that timing with the residency start date) can yield significant tax savings. Many executives can control some aspects of when they recognize income or losses; for example, by having dividends paid from controlled companies, accelerating collections, or recognition of bonuses and services income. Due to the importance of timing, individuals are well advised to consult with their U.S. tax advisors early when considering a relocation.

    1. Planning for a potential long term move to the United States.

    While people are always excited about a short term relocation to the United States, it is common for some people to end up staying in the United States indefinitely. While income tax for U.S. purposes is an important concern, the U.S. estate tax, which can be as high as 40 percent of the taxable estate, can be extremely devastating. Planning can be done in advance of a move to the United States to help mitigate the impact of the estate tax, if there is even a remote chance that the individual might stay in the United States long term.

    1. Do not keep money undeclared.

    Even if one is going to the United States for only a short period of time, one should under no circumstances fail to report income or assets to the United States. The United States taxes its residents on a worldwide basis, unlike most other nations, and income earned outside of the United States must be reported and subject to tax. Foreign income and assets are also subject to special reporting requirements under U.S. law and the United States is extremely aggressive in this area. A U.S. tax advisor should be consulted on the tax and reporting obligations that might apply to an individual relocating to the United States, who will likely have significant income and assets in his or her home country.

     

    Author: Marnin Michaels, Partner, Baker & McKenzie Zurich, Switzerland

    www.bakermckenzie.com

  • U.S. EB-5 Program May Be Changing

    The U.S. EB-5 green card by investment program is on the verge of the most significant legislative changes in more than two decades.

    Established in 1990, the program has been virtually unchanged for more than two decades.  The central focus of the program is job creation – the foreign national’s investment must create 10 jobs for U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

    There are two types of EB-5 investments – direct and regional center.  The direct program is for an investor starting his own business.  The result of the investment must be 10 new full-time employees.

    The regional center program involves an investment in a project created by a developer, such as a hotel, health care facility or residential project.  The investor generally does not play an active management role.  For regional center projects, jobs created indirectly by the investment – such as construction jobs – can be counted.

    The regional center program, which constitutes about 90% of the all of the EB-5 investors, is a temporary program that has been renewed on many occasions.  However, the latest extension was for less than three months through December 11, as compared to previous extensions that have generally been three years at a time.  The reason is that the U.S. Congress is debating various amendments to the program that are likely pre-conditions to a longer term extension.  If passed, the amendments would include an increase in investment amount from the present $500,000 (or $1 million in certain geographical areas) to $800,000 (or $1,200,000 in non‑targeted areas).  Perhaps the most significant impediment to passage of legislation is a heated debate between rural state senators and urban state senators, the former wanting the legislation to incentivize investments in rural areas and the latter wanting to continue the present program that has resulted in significant investments in projects in urban areas.

    Also in contention is the issue of effective dates.  Some in Congressional leadership want to make the effective date retroactive, which would be highly controversial and would greatly prejudice investors who invested their money under the present rules.

    Although, as of the present date, it is possible that major legislation will be signed into law before the present expiration of December 11, it is more likely that there will be another extension of one year or less. As part of that extension, leadership in the House and Senate will likely insist on inclusion of certain “integrity measures” to insulate the program from fraudulent developers, threats to national security and regional center owners and developers with criminal or securities violations in their backgrounds.  If that happens, 2016 will likely be the pivotal year for substantive changes in the program.

    Author: H. Ronald Klasko Esq., Managing Partner, Klasko Immigration, Law Partners, LLP

    www.klaskolaw.com

  • U.S. EB-5 Program May Be Changing

    The U.S. EB-5 green card by investment program is on the verge of the most significant legislative changes in more than two decades.

    Established in 1990, the program has been virtually unchanged for more than two decades.  The central focus of the program is job creation – the foreign national’s investment must create 10 jobs for U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

    There are two types of EB-5 investments – direct and regional center.  The direct program is for an investor starting his own business.  The result of the investment must be 10 new full-time employees.

    The regional center program involves an investment in a project created by a developer, such as a hotel, health care facility or residential project.  The investor generally does not play an active management role.  For regional center projects, jobs created indirectly by the investment – such as construction jobs – can be counted.

    The regional center program, which constitutes about 90% of the all of the EB-5 investors, is a temporary program that has been renewed on many occasions.  However, the latest extension was for less than three months through December 11, as compared to previous extensions that have generally been three years at a time.  The reason is that the U.S. Congress is debating various amendments to the program that are likely pre-conditions to a longer term extension.  If passed, the amendments would include an increase in investment amount from the present $500,000 (or $1 million in certain geographical areas) to $800,000 (or $1,200,000 in non‑targeted areas).  Perhaps the most significant impediment to passage of legislation is a heated debate between rural state senators and urban state senators, the former wanting the legislation to incentivize investments in rural areas and the latter wanting to continue the present program that has resulted in significant investments in projects in urban areas.

    Also in contention is the issue of effective dates.  Some in Congressional leadership want to make the effective date retroactive, which would be highly controversial and would greatly prejudice investors who invested their money under the present rules.

    Although, as of the present date, it is possible that major legislation will be signed into law before the present expiration of December 11, it is more likely that there will be another extension of one year or less. As part of that extension, leadership in the House and Senate will likely insist on inclusion of certain “integrity measures” to insulate the program from fraudulent developers, threats to national security and regional center owners and developers with criminal or securities violations in their backgrounds.  If that happens, 2016 will likely be the pivotal year for substantive changes in the program.

     

    Author: H. Ronald Klasko Esq., Managing Partner, Klasko Immigration, Law Partners, LLP

    www.klaskolaw.com

  • Reopening of the Quebec Immigrant Investor Program

    After many different attempts to control the influx of Quebec Immigrant Investor Program (“QIIP”) applications, the Quebec immigration department has renewed the intake of QIIP applications under a quota system allocated to financial intermediaries (“Quota System”) for a second year.  Set at 1,750 applications (with a limit of 1,200 from a single country), this year’s quota will be available until January 29th 2016[1].

    Any would-be applicant first has to be pre-selected by a financial intermediary authorized to act as such by the Quebec government. There are currently 18 designated financial intermediaries dividing among themselves the available quota. This division, established by the Quebec government, is based on a formula taking into account their respective past contribution to the program, success rate and other criterions, resulting in some financial intermediaries having more quota than other.

    Observers of the program anticipate that applicants coming from China (including Hong Kong and Macau SARs) will easily reached the quota for a single country (1,200), while the remaining available units may remain partially unused.

    The Quota System is one of the many changes brought by the Quebec government in recent years to increase the efficiency of the QIIP processing, among which:

    • A new document checklist was adopted, an attempt to objectivize the selection criterions.
    • An increase of decisions “on file”, i.e. without an interview.

    The clear objective of these changes is to reduce the processing time. The goal is to process an application within 12 months, between the date of submission and the time decision is rendered in a given case.

    While the selection criterion became stricter with the adoption of the new document checklist, it greatly clarifies the government’s expectations.

    We therefore believe that the important reduction of the backlog in recent years, coupled with the strict control of the annual influx of new applications and clearer selection criterion have the potential of reducing the processing time and possibly increasing the success rate, resulting in making the QIIP an attractive option in this highly competitive environment.

     

    Author: Francois Mandeville,Founder and Managing Partner, Mandeville & Associates Ltd.

    www.mandeville.com.hk

     

    [1] It is noteworthy to mention that applicants demonstrating an advanced intermediate level of French is not affected by the above quota system and can submit an application at any time.

     

     

     

  • Reopening of the Quebec Immigrant Investor Program

    After many different attempts to control the influx of Quebec Immigrant Investor Program (“QIIP”) applications, the Quebec immigration department has renewed the intake of QIIP applications under a quota system allocated to financial intermediaries (“Quota System”) for a second year.  Set at 1,750 applications (with a limit of 1,200 from a single country), this year’s quota will be available until January 29th 2016[1].

    Any would-be applicant first has to be pre-selected by a financial intermediary authorized to act as such by the Quebec government. There are currently 18 designated financial intermediaries dividing among themselves the available quota. This division, established by the Quebec government, is based on a formula taking into account their respective past contribution to the program, success rate and other criterions, resulting in some financial intermediaries having more quota than other.

    Observers of the program anticipate that applicants coming from China (including Hong Kong and Macau SARs) will easily reached the quota for a single country (1,200), while the remaining available units may remain partially unused.

    The Quota System is one of the many changes brought by the Quebec government in recent years to increase the efficiency of the QIIP processing, among which:

    • A new document checklist was adopted, an attempt to objectivize the selection criterions.
    • An increase of decisions “on file”, i.e. without an interview.

    The clear objective of these changes is to reduce the processing time. The goal is to process an application within 12 months, between the date of submission and the time decision is rendered in a given case.

    While the selection criterion became stricter with the adoption of the new document checklist, it greatly clarifies the government’s expectations.

    We therefore believe that the important reduction of the backlog in recent years, coupled with the strict control of the annual influx of new applications and clearer selection criterion have the potential of reducing the processing time and possibly increasing the success rate, resulting in making the QIIP an attractive option in this highly competitive environment.

    Author: Francois Mandeville,Founder and Managing Partner, Mandeville & Associates Ltd.

    www.mandeville.com.hk

    [1] It is noteworthy to mention that applicants demonstrating an advanced intermediate level of French is not affected by the above quota system and can submit an application at any time.

  • Diverse and Neutral immigration solutions for Chinese

    Massive migration from China took place starting from the early 19th century right into 1950s, mainly driven by starvation and invasions from foreign countries. After 1980 however, an increasing number of Chinese migrate overseas with the implementation of a liberal migration policies .  The majority of emigrants  are  China’s  richest individuals and its highly educated elites who cite  higher political openness, quality of life, economic stability, and better educational opportunities as the main reasons for moving abroad. According to Pew Research, China has changed from being the 7th largest exporter of immigrants to the 4th largest, with an increase of more than 125 percent in population. In 2015, overseas Chinese has reached over 60 million. US, Canada, Australia, Japan and Singapore are the most popular immigration countries for Chinese. More importantly, over half of the immigrants are affluent individuals with investment immigration becoming one of the most popular migration choices.

    Emigrating from China still remains a complicated and lengthy process because of the increase restrictive immigration policy of other countries and their frequent amendments. Nonetheless, wealthy Chinese are still interested in emigration for reasons that range from protection, tax planning, family wealth / succession planning etc., to the growth of their wealth.

    Donglin Family Office is dedicated to HNW (high net worth) individuals in the Great China region. A survey conducted by the Donglin among its HNW clients of the past 5 years found that over 80% of them are planning to emigrate for different reasons. The top reasons for moving abroad are better educational and employment opportunities for their children. Meanwhile, concerns about pollution and food safety problems has gained increasing considerations among HNW Chinese. Concerns about their welfare has slightly decreased while tax issue has rapidly increased due to the implementation of stringent tax laws and higher tax rates in traditional immigrant countries such as the US.  Moreover, over 80% of the survey participants expected to receive sufficient information as well as neutral advice when emigrating including education, employment, tax and potentially succession issues overseas.

    Donglin is offering diversified and need-based resources and services concerning emigration to our clients. Emigration planning plays a significant role for family firms like Donglin in both the protection of and wealth succession planning. Life-long advice as offered by Donglin helps clients to reduce potential risks and ensure wealth is passed on through generations.

    In 2015, Donglin became the Founding Member of the Advisory Committee of the IMC (Investment   Migration   Council)   –   the   worldwide   association   for   investor   immigration and citizenship-by-Investment, bringing together the leading stakeholders in the field and giving the industry a voice. As a leading family company in China, Donglin is speaking for our clients from around the world about the emigration concerns and consolidate cutting-edge information and resources for HNW Chinese. Currently, Donglin is exploring cooperation with the UN, APEC and with philanthropic organizations to boost the healthy flow of world population and wealth succession.

    Author: Crystal Jiang, Principal, Donglin Family Office, Hong Kong

    www.donglinfamily.com

Pin It on Pinterest

Skip to content