Category: News

  • Eastern Caribbean Currency Union: IMF Staff Concluding Statement of the 2019 Discussion on Common Policies of Member Countries

    A Concluding Statement describes the preliminary findings of IMF staff at the end of an official staff visit (or ‘mission’), in most cases to a member country. Missions are undertaken as part of regular (usually annual) consultations under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, in the context of a request to use IMF resources (borrow from the IMF), as part of discussions of staff monitored programs, or as part of other staff monitoring of economic developments.

    The authorities have consented to the publication of this statement. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF’s Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF Executive Board for discussion and decision.

     

    Growth has recovered strongly in 2018-19 but is set to moderate, with the outlook clouded by downside risks. The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) and individual Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU) countries have continued to advance their reform agendas, but progress needs to be accelerated. While robust national fiscal frameworks remain key to the region’s policy priorities, well-sequenced steps to regional integration can catalyze capacity and resources. This would include (i) increasing fiscal integration, (ii) enhancing financial integration, and (iii) solidifying the monetary union by raising payment’s efficiency through—but not limited to—cautiously piloting a digital currency.

    1.  Growth rebounded in 2018 and has remained robust so far in 2019. ECCU’s GDP growth accelerated to 3¾ percent in 2018, reflecting buoyant tourism and sizable Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) inflows, which helped support Dominica’s reconstruction-led recovery from the 2017 hurricane. Growth momentum has remained strong in 2019, while inflation has been muted. The region’s fiscal deficits have been edging upwards in 2018-19 despite continued strength in CBI inflows, but with the deficits remaining moderate, the public debt ratio declined in 2018 and is set to fall further in 2019. While the region’s external deficits are high, they are amply financed by FDI flows. Bank credit to the private sector remains weak despite substantial excess liquidity.

    2.  Going forward, growth is set to moderate, and risks remain mostly on the downside. GDP growth is expected to gradually ease to 2¼ percent, a long-term historical average for the region. CBI inflows are also projected to moderate. In the near term, economic activity would be supported by further post-hurricane reconstruction, tourism investment, and some agribusiness projects. Achieving the 60 percent of GDP debt target would remain challenging for most countries. Global risks, such as adverse confidence effects from rising protectionism and weaker US growth, could weigh on the outlook. Region-specific risks include natural disasters, increasing banks’ foreign exposures, continuing exit of global banks, and continued pressures on corresponding banking relationships (CBRs) against the backdrop of elevated non-performing assets. Positive surprises in CBI inflows, if well-managed, constitute potential upside risks.

    3.  Greater regional integration can substantially complement robust national policies in improving the outlook and mitigating risks. ECCU’s challenges are compounded by large shocks and lack of economies of scale. Robust national fiscal responsibility frameworks that ensure public debt sustainability and buffers are crucial for improving the ECCU growth potential. ECCB’s advocacy for achieving the 60 percent of GDP debt target by 2030 through national fiscal responsibility frameworks and its efforts to improve debt management have supported this process. In addition, IMF staff analysis suggests that well-sequenced steps toward regional integration can catalyze resources for better policy responses, as elaborated below.

    A. Increasing Fiscal Integration

    4.  Regional coordination of selected revenue policies could create fiscal space for ECCU’s public investment. The ongoing “race to the bottom” in competing for tax incentives and CBI program conditions limits the potential to raise revenue that could be channeled to productive spending, including resilience building. This highlights scope for the ECCU countries to coordinate tax incentives and CBI program conditions, while achieving the objective of making FDI more attractive through better infrastructure. In this context, the authorities’ ongoing collaboration on CBI programs’ financial integrity to improve their transparency and governance could help lower negative perceptions about the use of CBI programs. Such collaboration could support region-wide sustainability of these flows and financial stability.

    5.  Over the longer term, a regional pooling of fiscal resources can complement national fiscal buffers to build resilience against natural disasters and other shocks at a lower cost. While individual ECCU countries face similar risks, natural disasters put them in different economic conditions at a given time. The regional pooling of resources saved by limiting excessive growth of public consumption in good times could support macroeconomic stabilization and create scope for resilience building and other growth-enhancing investment in bad times. Staff calculations suggest that the size of a pooled fund would be about one-half of the sum of individual countries’ funds for the same stabilization effect. Such an arrangement would require a strong governance framework and should be financed by national budgets to protect ECCB’s international reserves and the credibility of its quasi-currency board arrangement. This pooling of resources could complement national insurance strategies against natural disasters, a key pillar of the Disaster Resilience Strategies currently being piloted in Dominica and Grenada.

    B. Enhancing Financial Integration

    6.  Accelerated progress on the ECCB’s reform agenda will help address financial system vulnerabilities. The ECCB in its capacity of a region-wide bank supervisor and regulator has continued to advance essential reforms, including strengthening its financial system stability function with deepened interaction with regional regulatory authorities, identifying regionally-systemic financial institutions, and improvement to its Financial Stability Report. The implementation of risk-based supervision, phase-in of Basel II/III standards, technology upgrades for supervisory operations, and enhanced AML/CFT frameworks continue to build supervisory effectiveness. Additional reforms are currently being pursued, such as establishing a shared services platform for indigenous banks; developing a deposit insurance scheme; implementing an e-conveyancing regime for collateral realization as part of the initiative to modernize insolvency frameworks; harmonizing non-bank financial laws; operationalizing a credit bureau; and preparing guidelines for the treatment of impaired assets. Authorities are also considering a macro-prudential framework for financial sector stability including the Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) function; and a framework for optimal regulation of the financial sector.

    7.  The reform agenda needs to be prioritized with key short-term actions. Despite improvements in Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) in most jurisdictions, efforts to repair bank balance sheets should be stepped up by (i) adopting effective plans for all banks to reduce NPLs below the 5-percent benchmark by end-2023, including via sales to the Eastern Caribbean Asset Management Company (ECAMC); (ii) requiring banks’ disposal of non-banking assets (including land); and (iii) strictly enforcing exposure limits and market risk management. ECCB’s and deposit-taking institutions’ governance frameworks should be reviewed and passage of critical legislation, including AML/CFT, should be expedited by remaining countries to increase compliance and enforcement. Consolidated supervision of financial groups should be advanced. Urgent measures are also necessary to monitor and address operational risk, including due to CBRs and cybersecurity. The new treatment of impaired assets standard, now expected by January 2020, should be implemented without delay.

    8.  Provided the critical short-term priorities are addressed, steps toward a fuller banking union could take place in the long term. These would involve: (i) enhancing the financial safety net with a robust deposit insurance scheme and (ii) establishing a regional resolution and crisis management framework. Both these steps require operationalizing credible fiscal backstopping as a key precondition, based on minimum regional fiscal responsibility commitments entrenched in national laws. Other reforms that should be implemented include: (i) advancing the regulatory regime for systemic institutions (including non-banks) to minimize regulatory gaps and shock propagation; (ii) consolidation of regional non-bank financial sector oversight to enhance coverage, address sector-specific risks, reduce compliance costs, and mitigate resource constraints; and (iii) progressing the establishment of a macroprudential mandate and toolkit to address region-wide systemic risk.

    C. Solidifying the Currency Union by Raising Payment System’s Efficiency

    9.  Building on the successful launch of the Electronic Funds Transfer, the ECCB, national authorities, and financial institutions should continue efforts to modernize the payment system. Major banks have recently begun to offer various electronic payment services. The authorities are also examining options to integrate credit unions in the core payment systems. This would help competition, but it should be considered in the context of establishing an appropriate prudential oversight framework. The ongoing review of the legal framework pertaining to the payment system is also critical to allow emerging Fintech and nonbank e-payment services to operate and innovate. Advancing e-government initiatives would also help increase the volume of digital payments to help address small-economy constraints and enhance the business opportunities for the private sector. In this context, the Digital Economy Project, which is currently in its preparatory phase, would support digital transformation of key services provided by ECCU Governments. Early introduction of a digital ID is needed to support these initiatives.

    10.  The digital currency pilot project, launched by the ECCB, should proceed cautiously as planned. The authorities view the digital currency as an option to reduce excessive reliance on cash and cheques; improve the efficiency of the retail payment system; and support economic development by reducing financial frictions. To contain vulnerabilities, important safeguard measures are embedded in the design of the digital currency, such as the limited size of its holding and transaction values, no interest accrued; and does not include foreign currency transactions. That said, the digital currency could expose the ECCB and the financial system to various risks, including those related to financial intermediation, financial integrity, and cybersecurity. The pilot will provide the opportunity to examine these risks, test the design of the digital currency, and assess any policy gaps. After the pilot, the ECCB is planning to thoroughly review its results, and more work may be warranted, especially to further test the digital currency system, strengthen cybersecurity and AML/CFT operations, and update legal and regulatory frameworks.

     

    Source: imf.org
    Published: 7 January 2020

     

  • Biometric Check to be Introduced in CBI Programme of St Kitts and Nevis

    To ensure the immigration program’s uprightness, following second citizenship demand, the administration says it is focused on dedicating funding for progressively powerful security checks.

    “The interest for economic citizenship in our nation brought about expanded expenditure for individual verifications and other expanses related with the support of a powerful CBI Program,” said Prime Minister Harris.

    Harris believes the two islands are “the best in the business around the world,” which is the reason under the due diligence process every candidate for citizenship is completely screened.

    In the wake indenpence, the islands presented the CBI program in 1984. It is a financial citizenship program, which PM Harris claims is “considered the most alluring, and that is shown by the certainty of our customers and operators.”

    People contributing at least $150,000 to the Sustainable Growth Fund (SGF), and who have passed the diligence checks, can get second citizenship. The program means to encourage financial activities. Monetary residents can travel visa free or get visa on appearance for in excess of 150 nations and regions.

    Canada, the U.S. furthermore, most E.U. nations have adopted comparative citizenship by investment programs.

     

    Source: wicnews.com
    Published: 2 February 2020

     

  • Brexit Day and UK Immigration and Visa Update 31 Jan 20

    The UK is set to leave the European Union today at 11pm, 31 January 2020, with Brexit day marking a new era for the nation and the future of UK immigration policy. Over the past three decades, immigration to the UK has boomed. Since 1990, 14 million people have arrived in the UK and nine million have left, leaving a net inflow of five million people.

    UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, has stated that a post-Brexit immigration system will put ‘people before passports.’ Speaking at the recent UK-Africa Investment Summit, Mr Johnson said UK immigration would become “fairer, treating people the same wherever they come from.”

    While the UK will officially leave the EU at 11pm on 31 January 2020, freedom of movement for British and EU citizens will not end until 31 December 2020, following a ‘Brexit transition period’.

    Australian-style points-based UK immigration and visa system

    Following the transition period, the UK government plans to introduce an Australian-style, points-based immigration system by January 2021. However, UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has urged the government to implement the Australian-style system by the end of 2020.

    Meanwhile, the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) – a so-called independent body that advises the UK government on matters of immigration – rejected an Australian-style system, describing the plan as ‘a soundbite’.

    The MAC’s criticism of the system has left the Conservative government scrambling to rescue the Prime Minister’s pledge to introduce an Australian-style immigration system.

    A MAC report said: “The implementation of such a system – based on factors such as age, qualifications and previous study in the UK – risks repeating past mistakes and should be introduced for highly skilled migrants only.”

    Instead, the MAC advised a minimum salary threshold for most workers offered a job – a system Mr Johnson sought to scrap – but set at £25,600 instead of the £30,000 proposed under Theresa May’s premiership.

    Elsewhere, the Nuffield Trust – a health think tank – slammed the government’s proposals, saying an Australian-style system would make it ‘virtually impossible for foreign nationals to work in most frontline social care jobs in the UK.’

    Business leaders criticised the government’s rejection of regional UK visas and any movement on a £25,600 minimum salary threshold, arguing that it would be catastrophic for companies based in poorer parts of the UK – mostly outside London.

    However, Priti Patel has suggested that the MAC report would be rejected following the sacking of the body’s chairman, Professor Alan Manning.

    Patel said: “The British public voted for change when it comes to immigration and with that they have voted for an Australian-style points-based system. The MAC’s recommendations are purely advisory.”

    UK employers urged to ‘get their house in order’ ahead of Brexit day

    A report published by Personnel Today urged UK business leaders to ‘get their houses in order’ ahead of the UK’s full divorce from the EU.

    A number of business groups have said that while nothing will happen immediately after Brexit day, due to the transition period, employers need to use the time to be fully prepared come 31 December, 2020.

    Many UK employers fear that Brexit will stifle plans to retain and attract overseas staff in the future. Manufacturers in particular seemingly face huge challenges, with 81% of firms saying that they’re having difficulty hiring skilled employees.

    However, economist and CEO at people analytics firm Orgvue, Rupert Morrison, launched a scathing attack on UK businesses, saying that employers need to ‘get over’ their Brexit fears and start planning for a future outside the EU.

    Morrison said: “British businesses need to grow up and quit complaining about Brexit as though it’s breaking news and they haven’t had a chance to prepare.”

    Mr Morrison continued: “Large companies in the UK are currently investing more in their telecoms services than they are on understanding their business, the work that needs to be done, and the workforce they need to achieve it.”

    “It’s no wonder business leaders are using Brexit as an excuse for growth concerns. But one referendum, two elections, three prime ministers and four years later, businesses are somehow still floundering due to ‘uncertainty’ and skills shortages,” Morrison added.

    The future of UK immigration and visa policy

    Uncertainty still looms over the future of UK immigration in a post-Brexit era. The issue clearly divides opinion. A series of celebrations and protests have taken place across the country to mark what will be an historic day in British history.

    However, with the UK Home Secretary hinting that the government will go against the MAC’s recommendations, it seems that an Australian-style points-based immigration system is likely to represent the future of UK immigration.

    Prior to his sacking, former MAC chairman Professor Alan Manning said: “No other country uses a points-based system as its only route for work migration.”

    However, Professor Manning did add that ‘while immigration hasn’t harmed employment opportunities or wages, it hasn’t really benefitted them very much either.’

     

    Source: workpermit.com
    Published: 31 January 2020

  • Robert Abela Stands By Cash-for-Passport Scheme

    The controversial cash-for-passports scheme will be retained, Prime Minister Robert Abela confirmed after pressure from the opposition and the business lobby to suspend or scrap it.

    Dr Abela was speaking after Nationalist party leader Adrian Delia said he had refused to consult with the government on who should be appointed the programme’s regulator.

    Dr Delia said he had told Dr Abela that it was time to scrap the Individual Investor Programme, which sees wealthy individuals pay for Maltese, and therefore EU, citizenship.

    In a tweet he said the so-called ‘golden passports’ scheme should end because it had “left our country’s reputation in tatters”.

    “As Opposition and PN leader, I refused to be consulted on the appointment of the scheme’s regulator,” he said.

    Dr Delia has long called for a suspension of the scheme and last week, the Chamber of Commerce also said it should be paused.

    According to the latest annual report, the programme raised €271.6 million in the last financial year, which equated to 2.11 per cent of the country’s wealth (GDP).

    However, sales have dropped persistently and the current regulator Carmel De Gabriele partly blamed the fall on bad publicity.

    The scheme has come under the spotlight, with an EU Parliament delegation describing it as risking “importing criminals and money laundering into the whole EU”.

    However Dr Abela told Times of Malta he had no plans to either suspend or scrap the scheme.

    “I have already stated that I plan to stick with the scheme,” he said on Friday.

    “If I have to make any due diligence changes I will but the scheme has brought a lot of good to the country and I want to preserve it.”

    However he stated that the due diligence surrounding the scheme was already very high, evidenced by the volume of applications that are rejected.

    Dr Abela said it was a mistake for Dr Delia not to consult with him over appointing a regulator.

    “I wished to have his input. I think that to abdicate from this responsibility is a mistake on his behalf.”

    “I’m ready to collaborate with him over this issue as I believe this collaboration would lead to better results.”

     

    Source: timesofmalta.com
    Published: 1 February 2020

  • Trump Expands Long-Standing Immigration Ban to Include Six More Countries

    President Trump added six countries to his administration’s travel ban Friday — including ­Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country — in a widely anticipated expansion that Democrats blasted as “clearly discriminatory” against people from predominantly black and Muslim nations.

    Citing national security concerns, officials at the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department said Trump’s proclamation would bar most citizens of Nigeria, Eritrea, Myanmar and Kyrgyzstan from coming to work and live in the United States. Two nations, Tanzania and Sudan, would be banned from applying for the visa lottery, which issues up to 50,000 visas a year worldwide to countries with historically low migration to the United States.

    The new ban takes effect Feb. 22; travelers who have received visas or are in transit at that time will not be affected. Travelers who have not received visas will be subject to the ban but will be automatically considered for waivers.

    Officials estimate the policy will affect several thousand people a year, on the basis of recent immigrant arrivals from those countries. The policy will now limit immigration from 13 countries.

    Trump’s initial ban in 2017, which initially targeted Muslim countries, ignited chaos during his first days in office amid allegations that the ban was discriminatory and illegal. The policy was knocked down in federal courts and then reinstated by the U.S. Supreme Court, and the new expansion signals that the administration is not going to relent in its efforts to slash immigration during an election year.

    Added to robust measures at the U.S. southern border that have curbed Central American migration in recent months, the targeting of immigrant visas also allows the president to advance his goal of reducing family-based migration.

    Trump, in a proclamation issued Friday, said the countries were chosen after an extensive evaluation that examined travel security and measures, and national security threats in dozens of countries; those that made the list were chosen from a recommendation that U.S. officials made in January.

    “The six additional countries recommended for restrictions in the January 2020 proposal are among the worst performing in the world,” Trump said in the proclamation, but he said he was encouraged by their “willingness to work with the United States” to correct the deficiencies.

    A statement from the White House said that it is “fundamental to national security, and the height of common sense, that if a foreign nation wishes to receive the benefits of immigration and travel to the United States, it must satisfy basic security conditions outlined by America’s law-enforcement and intelligence professionals.”

    Refugees from the six countries are exempt from the ban.

    House Democrats attacked the expansion hours before the Trump administration unveiled it, calling the ban “xenophobic” and “reckless” and saying there is no evidence of national security threats that would warrant such restrictions.

    Speaking on the condition of anonymity on a call with reporters, federal officials would not detail specific national security threats in the six countries for fear of disclosing information to “nefarious” actors there. But officials said there were “gaps and vulnerabilities” in each nation that could be exploited by terrorists and criminals.

    Officials said the countries had been selected on the basis of a ranking system that evaluated countries for compliance with various vetting and information standards as well as terrorism risks. The standards they looked at included whether the countries use biometric passports; whether the country reports theft and loss of passports adequately to the United States or Interpol; whether it shares information on known or suspected terrorists and criminals; whether it shares examples of its passports with the United States so they can be used to determine signs of fraud.

    The current ban prohibits immigrant and most temporary forms of travel to the United States for citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and North Korea, as well as certain visits for some Venezuelan government officials. All but two, Venezuela and North Korea, are majority Muslim. Trump in 2018 complained about accepting too many immigrants from Africa, Haiti and El Salvador, which he labeled “shithole countries.”

    “Our country has to be safe,” Trump told reporters last week at a news conference in Davos, Switzerland.

    U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.), who represents Houston, home to a large number of Nigerians, said there are concerns with terrorist groups in some countries but that there are “bad actors” in China and Russia, both not included in the ban.

    “We believe in the process of due process, freedom of movement. . . . They are the national and international values that we show to the world,” she said, adding that Trump abused his power because he bypassed Congress. “This administration has stripped and shredded those values with no basis in security.”

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Congress plans to vote soon on legislation that would substantially restrict the president’s authority to limit such travel to the United States, but the measure is unlikely to clear the Republican-dominated Senate.

    Jessica Vaughan, the director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonprofit organization that favors restrictions on immigration, said she hopes Trump’s proclamation will lead to greater passport controls in the targeted countries.

    “Everybody’s being evaluated, and these are countries that didn’t make the cut,” said Vaughan, who was a U.S. consular officer in the early 1990s.

    But she said it would have been more effective had Trump also imposed restrictions on temporary visas, because security lapses could still occur. “All it takes is one entry by a terrorist to cause a problem,” she said.

    Of the six new countries, Nigeria also has the largest number of immigrants in the United States — about 300,000, not counting their U.S.-born children — with many in Texas, Maryland and New York. Nigerian immigrants and their children were more likely to have college degrees than the overall U.S. population, according to a Migration Policy Institute report. Nigerians also accounted for one of the largest groups of visa overstays in 2018, according to DHS.

    The ban is expected to disrupt millions of dollars of business deals, analysts say, as well as freeze a robust flow of Nigerian students to the United States that, according to the Commerce Department, contributed approximately $514 million to the U.S. economy in the past academic year. The number of Nigerian travelers to the United States dropped 20 percent last year after the U.S. government ended a frequent-traveler program and increased entry fees.

    Republicans and Democrats have raised questions about the effectiveness of the travel ban and other “extreme vetting” measures under the Trump administration. After a Saudi military trainee shot and killed three sailors in December at a naval air station in Florida, Republican lawmakers asked the Trump administration to explain why it allowed Saudi military trainees into the country.

    Though citizens of the banned countries can apply for waivers if they are denied entry, few receive them. Approximately 10 percent of the 72,000 applications for waivers to the ban filed by citizens of Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and Syria were granted in the past two years, according to the State Department.

    Source: washingtonpost.com
    Published: 31 January 2020

  • Legal Technicality Holding Up Cyprus’ Revocation of 26 Citizenship

    Following a comprehensive round of retroactive due diligence on citizenship by investment applications approved prior to the 2018 tightening of vetting procedures, Cypriot authorities identified 26 cases of inappropriate naturalizations. To rectify missteps of the past, the government vowed to revoke those citizenships.

    But the country’s own citizenship law has so far foiled the revocation plans. Philefteros explains the convoluted legal issue:

    The gap appears to be found in the Law on the Population Register Act of 2002 (141 (I) / 2002) and more specifically in Article 113 which provides for the deprivation of citizenship. 
    The article at issue states that “A citizen of the Republic who is a citizen by registration or is a naturalized person shall cease to be a citizen of …” The Council of Ministers may by decree deprive any citizen of the Republic who is a naturalized citizen by virtue of its provisions. Article 111 or a person registered under the provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 110 a person, if he is satisfied that such citizen:

    (a) By works or words he has demonstrated, dishonesty or malice in the Republic;

    (b) in any war waged by the Republic illegally engaged in a transaction or communicated with the enemy or engaged in or engaged in any business which is performed so as to help the enemy in this war;

    (c) within ten (10) years from the registration or naturalization was sentenced in any country to imprisonment for particularly heinous offense or an offense involving moral turpitude a, provided that such conviction concerns an offense which constitutes the Republic offense is particularly heinous or moral turpitude, which carries a prison sentence.”

    The point at issue relates to the fact that the provisions of the nationality deprivation legislation cover Article 111 and Article 110, while the cases of passports for investment are covered by Article 111A of the relevant legislation.

    Article 111A (2) provides that the Council of Ministers may authorize the alienation of foreign businessmen and investors without any requirements of the legislation being met. For such cases and for honorary naturalization cases, the Council of Ministers shall issue Regulations specifying the terms and conditions under which naturalization is permitted.

    The legal issue, therefore, is that Article 111A is not included in Article 113 which provides for the deprivation of Cypriot citizenship.

    Jho Low, the family of Hun Sen, and other CIP-naturalized Cypriots whose passports were destined for the shredder are, consequently, still in possession of their citizenships. This impasse is unlikely to last very long, however, as the ministers of Interior and Justice are reportedly planning to meet with the Attorney General “soon” to discuss how the law can be amended to accommodate the special circumstances.

    In a piece of good news for the program, the three due diligence firms officially appointed to audit applications going back to 2013 report that they have identified no further cases, beyond the 26, of CIP-citizens doing anything to warrant alienation.

     

    Source: imidaily.com
    Published: 5 February 2020

  • Dominica Opens Embassy In United Arab Emirates

    The Commonwealth of Dominica has established a new embassy in the capital of the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi – becoming the first Dominican mission to the country, but also to the Middle East.

    Speaking during the opening ceremony, earlier this week, Dominican Prime Minister, Roosevelt Skerrit, said the embassy also comes to service a ‘small but dynamic’ community of Dominican economic citizens, which is growing via the island’s world-leading Citizenship by Investment (CBI) Programme.

    The government of Dominica has appointed Hubert John Charles as the Ambassador to the UAE.

    Prior to his new appointment, Charles served as the Dominican Ambassador to the United States and as the Permanent Representative of Dominica at the Organisation of American States.

    “Thanks to the Citizenship by Investment Programme, Dominica already has a small but dynamic population, resident in the UAE and contributing to the dynamism of its service sector and to sustainable development at home,” said Skerrit.

    He added that the new Dominican Embassy in Abu Dhabi will serve as “a crucial link between what is in effect the Dominican diaspora, here, in the UAE and the homeland.”

    “As a result of the success and good reputation of the CBI Programme, investors’ trust in both, Dominica and its Programme remains unshaken. Dominica grants successful CBI applicants valuable citizenship benefits like family security, visa-free and visa-on-arrival travel to 140 destinations and growing business opportunities.”

    Middle Eastern families and single individuals can obtain Dominican citizenship upon making an investment into the island’s economy, but only if they pass all the due diligence checks. Applicants choose from either making a minimum US$100,000 contribution to the Economic Diversification Fund or an investment worth at least US$200,000 in pre-approved real estate, comprising a selection of luxury hotels.

    With a growing number of economic citizens from the UAE, the Prime Minister said that his administration will assist its new citizens.

    The Dominican Embassy in Abu Dhabi will provide consular services to Dominican nationals, issuance of documentation, emergency notices, tourism advice and other services.

     

    Source: caribbeannationalweekly.com
    Published: 27 January 2020

  • Cyprus Nears Visa Waiver Agreement With USA, Says Foreign Minister

    Cypriot Foreign Minister Nicos Christodoulides has told local press he expects new developments soon with regards to a visa-waiver agreement with the United States.

    “Our aim is to have developments towards that direction within 2020,” Christodoulides said on Tuesday, according to Cyprus Mail, adding that the competent deputy minister of the US government was slated to visit the island this month to discuss the way forward for a visa-waiver agreement between the two countries. The question of how to achieve the goal will be the subject of conversation during the official visit, which will include meetings with the Ministries of Justice and Interior.

    The US’ visa waiver program is an exclusive club consisting of only 39 member countries, including most EU member states with the exceptions of Cyprus, Bulgaria, Croatia, and Romania.

    The EU has an “umbrella” visa-waiver agreement with the United States – whose citizens are welcome without a visa in all EU countries – and has repeatedly prodded the US to reciprocate by extending that privilege to all its member states. The US, meanwhile, has stated intentions to include also the remaining EU members but wants those countries to first comply with certain criteria on “security, crime, and terrorism”.

    All four EU-member states remaining outside the visa-waiver program have ratified agreements on “Preventing and Combating Serious Crime” and are now working to fully implement the measures thereto pertaining.

     

    Source: imidaily.com
    Publication: 20 January 2020

  • Seven Elections That Could Affect the CIP-Market This Year

    Seven countries that either have or are considering a citizenship by investment program will go to the polls in 2020. In some nations, citizenship by investment looms as a key election issue while, for others, it takes a backseat to the common hot button issues of job creation and the delivery of social services. But for politicians, voters, and international observers alike, an understanding of how CIPs are going to influence elections is key to identifying national and global trends that will impact the CIP industry as a whole.

    Guyana
    Guyana’s promising future is amongst the biggest stories in the Caribbean and, indeed, the wider world. The recent discovery of substantial oil reserves in Guyanese waters forecasts the nation’s future as one of considerable wealth, especially as oil production is now officially underway with production beginning late last month.

    Given the nation’s uptick in wealth, renewed interest in the country and its economic opportunities will follow. It is, therefore, no surprise that new supporters of a Guyanese CIP are emerging.

    This issue is likely to show up in the election campaign in March. Due to a political crisis, and delay in the election date, the Guyanese are going to the polls focusing chiefly on the failure of office and not the potential for new citizens via a CIP.

    St. Kitts and St. Nevis
    The cradle of CIPs is set to vote this year as well, although a specific date has not been called. Given CBI’s outsize role in the country’s economy, it would take a brave politician to question its right to life. Yet, if the CIP arises as a political issue, the opposition will likely cause scandal by pointing to government incompetence in its management of the program, warranted or not. As it stands, this is exactly what opposition leader Dr. Denzil L. Douglas is doing.

    In the lead-up to this year’s election, the prospect of a Douglas victory is sure to make new CIP citizens nervous due to his promises of a plan to revoke for all passports obtained via fraudulent means. On the other hand, Douglas was prime minister in 2014 when another scandal swept through the nation’s CIP, and his presence in that glass house may discourage him from throwing too many political stones.

    St. Vincent and the Grenadines 
    St. Vincent and the Grenadines is a tinderbox of present CIP debates within the Caribbean, showing a substantial contrast between the government and opposition’s position. Opposition leader, Godwin L. Friday, has promised a CIP if his New Democratic Party wins office in this year’s election.

    Friday’s previous remarks reveal his CIP vision is one that primarily funds capital works and does not pay for governance costs such as public servants’ salaries – something Friday feels would make the nation’s economy too dependent upon the CIP. This pledge contrasts with the longstanding position of Prime Minister Dr. Ralph Gonsalves, who has firmly dismissed the notion that a CIP could commence under the incumbent government. The election will take place no later than December 2020.

    Trinidad and Tobago
    Trinidad and Tobago’s CIP flirtation has never turned into tangible plans despite several years of debate. According to many authoritative observers, Trinidad and Tobago remains among the most likely Caribbean countries to introduce a CIP.

    As a growing number of countries around the world continue to develop their own CIPs, there is pressure on Trinidad & Tobago to move sooner rather than later. Elections are expected in the second half of 2020.

    Europe and the Pacific
    Beyond the Caribbean, CIP-countries Vanuatu, Moldova, and Montenegro will each hold elections this year.

     

    Source: imidaily.com
    Published: 20 January 2020

  • Second Citizenship Programme is an Investment in the Future

    There has been an explosion in the investment migration market in recent years, with as many as 100 countries now offering either citizenship or residency by investment programmes. It is important that applicants gain value from their second citizenship, whether that is achieved through returns on investment or the benefits of visa-free travel.

    Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP) has been in operation since 2013. During that time, the Citizenship by Investment Unit has received in excess of 2,200 applications from more than 80 countries, with a five percent rejection rate. We believe inventive approaches to modernisation are the engine of economic development and, as such, have continued to modify our programme to best serve the national interest and respond to global investment trends.

    Freedom to choose
    Under the programme, and as regulated by law, any person above the age of 18 who meets our requirements may apply for citizenship by investment. They may also apply on behalf of their dependants, including their spouse, children (up to the age of 28), and parents or grandparents above the age of 58 who are fully supported by the applicant.

    The CIP offers four distinct investment opportunities, which is more than most other citizenship and residency investment programmes. Applicants can choose to either make a donation, invest in an approved real estate project, contribute to a local business venture or invest in the Antigua campus of the University of the West Indies.

    Most applicants choose to donate to the National Development Fund. This requires a one-time contribution of $100,000 (€90,763) – or $125,000 (€112,546) for families of five or more – to the government-managed investment fund, which finances crucial socioeconomic initiatives on our twin-island nation. The other three options offer a return on investment and a unique opportunity to integrate with the residents of Antigua and Barbuda.

    Applicants who opt for the real estate option must invest at least $400,000 (€363,052) and are required to pay any government processing and due diligence fees. They can choose from more than 30 types of property, including high-end beachfront condominiums, hotel rooms and luxury homes. Applicants may also qualify through joint ownership, provided that each applicant contributes a minimum investment of $200,000 (€181,526) to the purchase.

    Ownership must be maintained for at least five years following the purchase unless the buyer acquires an alternative approved property in Antigua and Barbuda. As most properties are covered by management agreements and are returned to a rental pool once purchased, investors can earn income on the property during the period of ownership.

    The greater good
    Through its investment in business option, the CIP accommodates applicants who wish to use their capital to establish commercial operations in a new market. A single investor may make an investment of at least $1.5m (€1.36m) in an approved business. Alternatively, where two or more individuals propose to make a joint investment, the minimum investment must total at least $5m (€4.54m) and each investor must contribute at least
    $400,000 (€363,052) to the business.

    There are no restrictions on the type of business that may be operated, so long as it falls within all legal sectors and activities. However, we are keen to diversify areas of economic activity on the islands and would warmly welcome small and medium-sized enterprises, particularly in the areas of green energy, tourism, IT, business process outsourcing, agriculture and food processing.

    The most recently launched investment option, the University of the West Indies fund, epitomises the principles upon which the CIP was built. Antigua and Barbuda believes it is essential that this programme improves life for all residents – old and new. By encouraging investment in the University of the West Indies, the programme facilitates the country’s development. In September 2018, the Cabinet of Antigua and Barbuda agreed to the creation of this fourth method of investment; in September 2019, the Five Islands Campus of the University of the West Indies opened its doors.

    This investment option has been uniquely designed to foster integration and cultural engagement. Applicants who proceed in this way are required to make a $150,000 (€136,144) investment (if they are supporting a family of four or more), which entitles one member of the family to a year’s tuition-only scholarship at the University of the West Indies. In this way, the applicant and their dependants are afforded an opportunity to enhance their global mobility. In 2019, the University of the West Indies was listed among the top 600 institutions in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. This means the university ranks among the top five percent of universities worldwide. It is the only Caribbean institution on the global list.

    Earning respect
    Antigua and Barbuda’s citizenship programme has a robust and multi-tiered due diligence process that ensures it is globally trusted and respected. What’s more, it grants those on the programme visa-free travel to more than 150 countries, including the UK, the Schengen Area, Hong Kong and Singapore.

    The programme does not consider applicants from the seven countries – Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – on its ‘restricted countries’ list, unless they left their country of nationality before reaching the age of majority, continue to maintain no economic ties with the country and have permanent residency status in either Canada, the UK, the US, Australia, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia or the UAE. We welcome only the most deserving applicants and their dependants, and remain committed to managing a programme of the highest repute.

     

    Source: europeanceo.com
    Published: 15 January 2020

Pin It on Pinterest

Skip to content