Author: Niu Ltd

  • 70 years of Canadian Citizenship

    Prime Minister Mackenzie King was the first Canadian citizen. On January 3rd 1947, at Canada’s Supreme Court in Ottawa, he took the oath. Yesterday, 26 new Canadians did the same, also in the Supreme Court.

    70 years, and a couple of revisions later, people are waiting in queues around the world, eager for the opportunity.

    “To provide an underlying community of status for all of our people in this country that will help to bind them together as Canadians.”

    It was Member of Parliament, Paul Martin Sr. who was then Secretary of State, that introduced the bill in 1946.

    Heather Steel, of the Institute for Canadian Citizenship, says a sense of a distinct Canadian identity had been growing in the early 20th century, particularly in the wake of the two great wars.

    Along with simplifying legislation that was at that time in bits and pieces in a variety of places, the new act would clarify citizenship. Steel quotes Paul Martin Sr.’s vision at the time; “to provide an underlying community of status for all of our people in this country that will help to bind them together as Canadians.”

    Prior to 1947, all Canadians, were considered British subjects. While Mackenzie King’s act may have been just ceremonial, as all people born in Canada then, were automatically citizens, the conditions to become a citizen were established and viewed as a privilege.

    A person had to be 21 years of age, a resident for five years and intending to live their life in Canada, with a comfort in either the English or French language. They also had to be familiar with the rights and responsibilities of a Canadian, and be of good character.

    In 1977, another Liberal government revised several of these requirements, beginning with the establishment of citizenship as a right, not a privilege.

    To exercise this right, one had to be 18 years of age, living in Canada for three years, and the former distinctions between British subjects and people coming from other places in the world, were abolished. Restrictions on dual citizenship were also lifted.

    In 2014, the Conservative government passed a new citizenship act in what they saw as an effort to strengthen the process.

    Another year was added to the residency requirement and there was increased investigation into the validity of these statements to sort out cases of fraud.

    The language requirements were increased to provide demonstrations of proficiency for all applicants up to the age of 64. Both the guide and the citizenship test were revised to be more demanding with the result that more people failed.

    Several of the revisions left many Canadians uncomfortable and some of the changes became major issues in the 2015 federal election campaign.

    The increased conditions for revocation of citizenship, including anyone convicted of a crime of terrorism, as well as the conflict over women veiled or covered at citizenship ceremonies, became flash points of divisiveness.

    The so-called immigrant votes that the Conservatives had wooed away from the Liberals were no longer guaranteed.

    Following their victory, the current Liberal government, under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the son of the Prime Minister who oversaw the 1977 revision and made “multiculturalism’ official policy, has revised the act again. Some of the Conservative changes have been repealed and the bill is now making its way through the Senate.

    The residency requirement is back to three years, the language requirements have been loosened and only applicable to those up to the age of 54, to accommodate grandparents and the elderly joining family already here. And anyone convicted of terrorism will serve their time in Canada.

    Citizenship is back in the headlines again with the Conservative leadership race beginning to heat up. Today Lisa Raitt, a strong contender, challenged two of her rivals, Kellie Leitch and as yet undeclared candidate, businessman Kevin O’Leary.

    Raitt blasted them for their bluster accusing them of following in Donald Trump’s footsteps. Leitch has been vocal about screening new immigrants for “anti-Canadian values”. She is also one of the former MP’s who announced a tip-line for Canadians to report their neighbours, suspected of “barbaric practices”. It was one of the lowest points in the 2015 campaign, and partly responsible for the Conservative government’s resounding defeat.

    Leitch has not garnered much media attention in her leadership bid so far, so it may be surprising to some Canadians that her views are gaining support. Her campaign is now the best-financed. But Lisa Raitt claims a victory by either Leitch or O’Leary, will put the Conservatives in opposition at best, for a generation to come.

    The leadership decision will be made on May 27th. In the meantime, all of the new citizens will be observing the discourse.

    More than a million and half people have become Canadian citizens over these 70 years. For those who live here content with Permanent Resident status, perhaps the time to take a second look has arrived; one of the paramount rights citizenship confers, is the right to vote.

    As 2017 gets underway, more Citizenship ceremonies are being planned. Canada was one of the pioneers in creating a ceremony. And they have moved beyond the governmental locations out into the community. From high schools to football fields, these rights of passage can take place wherever Canadians would like to host them.

    Heather Steel, whose position at the ICC connects her with many of these ceremonies, says witnessing them is one of the best parts of her job.

     

    Source: rcinet.ca

  • Ambassador Casroy James Should Stand Down

    Antiguan and Barbudan diplomat Casroy James is being called on to voluntarily step down after he admitted to receiving monies purported to be bribery payments, but which he said were legitimate fees for consultancy work.

    Former National Security Minister of St Kitts & Nevis Dwyer Astaphan said that James, Antigua & Barbuda’s Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) should at least demit office until the matter of the alleged bribery is resolved.

    “At the least he should stand down until this matter clears ways if indeed it ever does. The government should invite him to stand down quietly and discreetly and if he doesn’t then stand him down. Show the world that we do things right around here,” Astaphan declared.

    “If an individual has to go down because of wrong doing or an allegation of wrong doing or even if he or she is innocent of wrongdoing but the perception could linger…then the government has always to act in the public interest.”

    Attorney at law Anthony Astaphan also gave OBSERVER media his view on what James’ next move should be. He said, “In his own personal interest and in the interest of the country…he should consider options available to him and make a decision that he thinks is in the best interest of himself, the government and the country.”

    While he maintained that he did not intend to impugn James’ character the former minister said, “It is important to ask this. If the money received from the bank was properly received by him then why return it?”

    With regard to James’ assertion that he received the money as Citizenship by investment Programme (CIP) agent, Dwyer Astaphan declared, “If he is an ambassador how can he still be a service provider for Antigua & Barbuda’s Citizenship by Investment? Might there be a conflict of interest?”

    Anthony Astaphan said that “there should be some regulation” to prevent any conflicts of interest for ambassadors occurring “so that when people take up the position they would be in absolutely no doubt as to how far they can go and how far they can carry those private interests”.

    Dwyer Astaphan added, “I can’t help but wonder how thorough his due diligence was in checking out his potential client. You have to know your customer.”

    Source: antiguaobserver.com

  • Changes to Citizenship by Investment Regulations: Saint Lucia

    On December 22nd, 2016, the minister to whom citizenship-by- investment is assigned signed a statutory instrument making amendments to the Citizenship-by-Investment Regulations No. 89 of 2015.

    At this time, these are the only changes that have been made to the Citizenship-by-Investment legislation.

    Please see below the full text of the changes made.   

    In exercise of the power conferred under section 40 of the Citizenship-by-lnvestment Act, No. 14 of 2015, the Minister responsible for the Citizenship-by-Investment Programme is assigned makes these Regulations:


    Citation and commencement

    1. (1) These Regulations may be cited as the Citizenship-by-lnvestment (Amendment) Regulations, 2016.

    (2) These Regulations shall come into force on the 1st day of January, 2017.


    Interpretation

    1. In these Regulations, “principal Regulations” means the   Citizenship-by-Investment Regulations, No. 89 of 2015.


    Amendment of regulation 7

    1. Regulation 7 of the principal Regulations is  amended by  revoking sub-regulations (3) and (7).


    Amendment of regulation 9

    1. Regulation 9 of the principal Regulations is amended by:
      1. inserting the designation (1) immediately before the word “Where”;
      1. inserting immediately after the new sub-regulation (1) the following –

    “(2) The Board shall retain twenty per cent of each monetary contribution to the Saint Lucia National Economic fund for the  marketing and promotion of the Citizenship-by-Investment  Programme.”.


    Insertion of new regulation
    15

    1. The principal Regulations are amended by inserting immediately after regulation l4, the following –


    Oath of allegiance

    1. A successful applicant shall sign the oath of allegiance before an attorney-at-law, Consular Officer of Saint Lucia, Honorary Consul of Saint Lucia, Notary Royal or Notary Public.”.


    Amendment of Schedule 1

    1. Schedule l of the principal Regulations is amended, in paragraph 1, by inserting in its proper sequence the following –

    ” Non-refundable administration fee –  Purchase of non-interest bearing Government Bonds US$ 50,0 00 “.


    Amendm
    ent of Schedule 2

    1. Schedule 2 of the principal Regulations is a mended by deleting paragraph 1 and replacing the following –

     

    Investment in the Saint Lucia National Economic Fund
    On approval of an application by means of an investment in the Saint Lucia National Economic Fund, the following minimum investment is required:
    Applicant applying alone US$100,000
    Applicant applying with spouse US$165,000
    Applicant applying with spouse and up to two other qualifying dependents US$190,000
    Each additional qualifying dependent at any age US$25,000

     

    The Citizenship-by-Investment Unit remains available to provide any additional information required.  

    Please visit www.cipsaintlucia.com or email info@cipsaintlucia.com

     

  • PM Harris Updates Public On Status Of SIDF

    Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Dr. the Honourable Timothy Harris, updated the general public on the status of the Sugar Industry Diversification Foundation (SIDF) during the Sitting of Parliament on Tuesday, December 13.

    Dr. Harris noted that there have been a number of issues with the SIDF leading up to the 2015 elections to which Team Unity spoke to with respect to the establishment and operations of the organization. He noted that concerns were based on the view “that (I) a body set up to receive funds derived from the Citizenship by Investment Programme must be accountable to the people of this country through its Parliament, and must not just be deposited into a private foundation and out of sight with no direct accountability to the Government and by extension the people of St. Kitts and Nevis, and (II) the very significant amount of funds deposited into the SIDF were being used to further projects, the viability of which has not been demonstrated, nor was the ability of those projects to diversity or grow the national economy clearly ascertainable”.

    Prime Minister Harris said that upon taking office in February 2015, plans were put in place to address the concerns.

    “Priority was given to understanding the workings of this private foundation which was being put in receipt of quite significant sums of money from the Citizenship by Investment Programme,” said Dr. Harris, while adding that a Board of Councillors was appointed with Dr. Robertine Chaderton as Chairperson. “The Board also comprises Mr. McClure Taylor, an attorney at law; Mr. Leon Lescott, who has vast experience in the hospitality industry; and Mrs. Marguerite Foreman, also an attorney at law, appointed as Secretary.”

    Prime Minister Harris spoke to the auditing firm Ernst & Young (EY) that was retained to conduct a review from 2010 to 2015. He noted that reports revealed that understanding the workings of the SIDF was not an easy task.

    “The Board was also informed that the SIDF has made decisions and spent vast amounts of funds without keeping proper records, such as board meeting notes, reports, opinions, or minutes of meetings – any of which would reveal on what basis certain decisions were taken with respect to these vast levels of expenditure,” said Dr. Harris. “A relevant minute with respect to a decision to spend millions of dollars, if it existed at all, would take up only a few lines, and there would be no detailed reason given as to why the particular decision was made.

    “The Ernst & Young report has shown that since its inception, to the year 2014, the SIDF has been the beneficiary of just about EC$1.5 billion dollars,” he said. “However, over the same period the SIDF has spent approximately 1 billion dollars with approximately EC$500 million spent in the two years prior to the 2015 General Election, almost double the normal annual expenditure of the SIDF since its inception. Among those rather startling levels of expenditure, was the discovery that about $150 Million dollars was spent on miscellaneous grants and donations in the two years leading up to the 2015 General Election. Most unfortunately but not unexpectedly, the SIDF operations were just another example of the gross profligacy for which the last administration had achieved most notoriety.”

    Dr. Harris noted that the Board was also informed that the SIDF operated for well over eight years “without by-laws and also without any formal internal process for feasibility assessments, return on investment analyses, and risk assessments, despite distributing vast sums of money which belonged to the people of St. Kitts and Nevis”.

    Source: zizonline.com

  • The 12 easiest and Cheapest Countries for Gaining European Union Residency

    Most countries in the world offer a deal offering fast-tracked residency permits and, ultimately, citizenship in return for investments in local businesses and property.

    With the UK voting to leave the European Union, it is becoming more attractive for wealthy Brits to look elsewhere for access to the European single market and the freedom of movement to travel and work across the 28-nation trading bloc.

    A study by citizenship consultancy firm Henley and Partners analysed the programmes offered by different governments across the world, ranking them by value, quality and reputation among other metrics.

    Here are the EU countries that performed the best for cheap and easy access to residency.

    12. Bulgaria — A deposit of around €500,000 in a Bulgarian government bond portfolio for five years is enough to qualify for Bulgaria’s residency programme.

    11. Greece — After being granted a so-called “D” visa, investors can apply for Greek residency after purchasing properties with a total value of €250,000.

    10. Cyprus — The Mediterranean island offers a low corporation tax of 12.5% for residents’ businesses but to apply you need to buy a property worth more than €300,000.

    9. Monaco — Residents of Monaco are not subject to income tax, capital gains tax or wealth tax and are able to travel visa-free to all Schengen area countries.

    8. Jersey — The island of Jersey is attractive for its low tax regime and mild climate. The minimum investment for residency costs £125,000 a year and is only open to those earning more than £625,000.

    7. United Kingdom — The UK might not be cheap but it is an attractive destination for rich families looking for good private schooling. The residency programme is tiered, asking for £2 million, £5 million and £10 million from investors.

    6. Latvia — To obtain a Latvian temporary residence permit, one has to buy real estate worth €250,000 and pay a 5% government fee.

    5. Spain — The country has a similar programme to Portugal, and a resident permit can be obtained by buying a €500,000 house or investing €2 million in Spanish government debt.

    4. Malta — Malta applies a low 15% tax rate for permanent residents, and the programme can be accessed for relatively little money — the purchase of a €275,000 property should do it.

    3. Portugal — To obtain Portuguese residency one can create 10 jobs with a business, transfer €1 million into a Portuguese bank or buy a house for €500,000.

    2. Belgium — A Belgian residency application takes as little as two months to process and employment in the country may be a qualifier on its own, negating the need for investment.

    1. Austria — Austria offers 10 different types of residency permit that do not require an investment and which can be used for visa-free travel across the Schengen area.

    Source: independent.co.uk

  • Dominica to host CIP meeting

    Representative from at least five Caribbean countries are to meet here later this week to discuss the Citizenship by Investment (CIP).

    The Coordinator of the Dominica Citizenship by Investment Unit, Emmanuel Nanton said that the countries in the Caribbean with CIPs had agreed to meet every quarter “to discuss where we are in the programme, review the industry, make recommendations for changes and basically to share information”.

    Nanton said that similar meetings have already been held in Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados.

    “At this meeting we expect to have participants from all the countries with citizenship programmes, including St. Kitts-Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia and Grenada”.

    Nanton said it is also expected that several key stakeholders, such as United States and Canadian embassies will be represented as well as a representative from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    Under the CIP, foreign investors are granted citizenship on conditions of making a substantial investment in the socio-economic development of any of the participating islands.

    Despite coming under criticism from some countries, the CIP represents a major investment strategy for some Caribbean countries.

     

    The Investment Migration Council had also been invited to participate and deliver a talk on industry standards.

     

    Source: antiguaobserver.com

     

  • Government of Canada Delivering Faster Processing and Shorter Wait Times for Spousal Reunification

    The Government of Canada is making it faster and easier for Canadians and permanent residents to reunite with their spouses.

    At the direction of the Minister, earlier this year Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) began a concerted effort to reduce processing times. From the start of 2016 to the fall, processing times were reduced by 15 percent for in-Canada applications and just over 10 percent for applications outside Canada.

    Starting today, processing times will be reduced even further with most spousal applications now being processed in 12 months. Complex cases may require more time.

    Applicants who already filed an application will not have to wait an additional 12 months to have them finalized. IRCC will continue to process applications in the order they have been received. Most families who have been waiting should have a decision on their sponsorship application no later than the end of December 2017.

    These new changes are expected to benefit more than 64 000 applicants by the end of 2017, and are the latest measures to bring families together.

     

    Quote
    “We have listened to Canadians and are delivering results. Bringing families together makes for a stronger Canada. Canadians who marry someone from abroad shouldn’t have to wait for years to have them immigrate or be left with uncertainty in terms of their ability to stay. What we’re announcing today is a more efficient, more considerate process to reunite families.”
    The Honourable John McCallum, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

     
    Quick facts
    -The application kit for new sponsors has been redesigned to be simpler and easier to understand. It will be available on December 15, 2016.
    -To bring families together, IRCC plans to admit 64 000 spouses and dependants in 2017, well above the average over the past decade of about 47 000.

     

    Source: news.gc.ca

  • New Marketing Initiative Set To Propel The SIDF Forward

    Another move to propel the St. Kitts-Nevis Sugar Industry Diversification Foundation (SIDF) forward is the introduction of the International Marketing Agent Initiative, says Les Khan, CEO of the Citizenship by Investment Unit (CIU), while appearing on the government’s radio-television programme “Working for You” on November 30.

    Mr. Khan explained that the initiative is another proactive effort to stay in line with the competition in the Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programme that will also help in identifying market opportunities in terms of who sells the product, where they sell it, and to whom.

    “This is information we didn’t have before,” he said. “So, with a combination of the new website that will give us all of this data, together with international marketing agents and the approach that we are taking, is one that is not just about competition.

    The CEO said that the CBI programme is not trying to “price up on the competition,” but that it is trying to put a process in place that allows the management of the international marketing agents, but at the same time give them an opportunity to be paid to bring applications into the programme.

    Some international marketers, who promote programmes, include Henley and Partners, Apex, CS Global and Arton Capital.

    “All of the service providers and developers have agents overseas who are marketing their product. We just don’t know who they are,” said Mr. Khan.

    Mr. Khan said that with the creation of the international marketing agent initiative, the service providers and developers will be asked to register and they will appear on the CIU website. Due diligence will also be done to know who is marketing the product. This will result in more control and will help to identify in what region the CBI programme is being marketed.

    “So, if we notice a movement in applications to one region, we could say what and who is our marketing agent, why is it happening, are they really promoting our interest or are they promoting their interest,” explained Mr. Khan.

    He added that because selling citizenship garners much cash flow, the controls are necessary to decipher whether or not the marketer is running a scam.

    “We know that sometimes out there, to use China as an example, you have 4 or 5 thousand agents and you hear stories about people selling citizenship, not St. Kitts and Nevis, from a taxi. You need to know who these people are and what they are actually selling and if it’s a scam,” said Mr. Khan.

    “It’s not just about the competition, it’s about the process, it’s about being able to control, who is taking our product and selling it,” Mr. Khan said.

     

    Source: thestkittsnevisobserver.com

  • New Zealand Doubles Cost of Investment Visa, Raises Quota

    New Zealand will double the amount of investment needed for permanent residency, the country’s immigration minister said on Wednesday, while also increasing the number of visas it issues.

    The ‘Investor 2’ visa will require NZ$3 million (1.68 million pounds) in investment from May next year and 400 places a year will be available, up from 300, Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse said in an emailed statement.

    The move signals the government is taking a closer look into how to translate its migration policy into economic benefit.

    New Zealand is in the midst of a migration boom, but fast-growing industries such as technology and construction have struggled to find enough high-skilled workers. This has left the central bank calling for the government to reconsider its strategy, concerned that the country is not attracting “quality” immigrants.

    More than NZ$2.9 billion had been invested in the country since the visa was introduced in 2009, but two-thirds of this was poured into bonds, according to the government.

    “The government believes there is an opportunity to rebalance this towards growth-oriented investments,” Woodhouse said.

    Requirements for the parallel ‘Investor 1’ visa, which requires NZ$10 million, are unchanged.

     

    Source: reuters.com

  • Chinese National Approved to Challenge Revocation of Citizenship

     

    Lihua Tian’s lawsuit against government will proceed as she has been granted permission to challenge the revocation of her citizenship and Antigua & Barbuda passport.

     

    The High Court judge dealing with the matter has also put halt to the probe by a Committee of Inquiry investigating Lihua’s application and the approval process.

     

    Justice Pearletta Lanns noted, “The grant of leave shall operate as a stay of proceedings of the Committee of Inquiry pending the determination of the claim for judicial review, which claim is to be considered with all convenient speed.”

     

    Speaking to the three-member committee, the judge declared, “The Respondents be, and they are hereby prohibited jointly and severally from performing their functions as a Committee of Inquiry established under Section 10 of the Antigua & Barbuda Citizenship Act, pending the final determination of the Claim for judicial review, or until further order.”

     

    The claimant, who allegedly invested over US$ 200,000 to get the Antigua & Barbuda passport under the Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP), is suing the government for depriving her of citizenship after alleging she willfully concealed material facts in support of her application.

     

    She is also challenging the placement of a CIP agent on a Committee of Inquiry set up to look into how she obtained citizenship.

     

    In the document filed in the High Court on September 6, the woman’s lawyer Dr David Dorsett contended that his client “disclosed all relevant information relating to her status to the agents who were processing her application.”

     

    As a result, Dr Dorsett wants the court to intervene, since it is alleged the agent from Henley & Partners who handled the application has refused to be subjected to cross-examination and the Committee of Inquiry has failed to issue a summons.

     

    The lawyer said “the agent is a material witness and it is our argument that the committee is unable to perform its function if a material witness is not available for cross examination.”

     

    That agent is said to have given Lihua the option to proceed with her application in the face of a wanted bulletin for her being posted by Interpol and in China. According to court documents filed, Lihua learned that a wanted bulletin had been issued for her on Interpol and in China just days after she submitted her CIP application.

     

    She alleges that she informed the agent of the bulletin and was advised she could still take the “risk” and proceed with her application.

     

     

    Source: antiguaobserver.com

Pin It on Pinterest

Skip to content